The Reasonable Ego

Inspired by the Self-Evident Truth That I am Invariably Corrrect

I See Paris, I See France.

Posted by SinisterDan on 15 May , 2007

Listed on humor-blogs.com

From high atop my perch here at The Sinister Tower, I see many things. Generally, I ignore most of what I see, preferring instead to return to the confines of my Mixology Research Center where I frustrate the staff by refusing to put anything in my Scotch. But not this week, Jim.

I have uncovered a perverse and unnatural alignment of world events. A series of events so unbelievable and so Byzantine that they rival when Alexios Angelos IV, in a brazen act of polygamy, was married to each of his footstools. In a clear indication that La République Française is slowly trying to overwhelm the Western World, I have taken note of the following news stories that now eek their way across the zeitgeist.

1. The French have elected a new French-person-in-Chief: On 6 May 2007, Nicolas Sarkozy won the second round of the presidential election in which he beat the holy living Roquefort out of Marie-Ségolène Royal. The final tally had Sarkozy winning by about 2.2 million votes.

No hanging chads here.

My own reaction was mixed. I can’t say that I wanted Royal to win, but she would have been much more pleasant to look at during G8 summits. What’s really amusing about this is the reaction in the United States (surprise!). Most nations that have strong ties with France congratulated the new guy and moved on. But you whacky kids south of the border took another approach entirely - you are one zany and unpredictable global hegemon!

The American Left (motto: We’re Lost in Victory) quickly derided Sarkozy as another lap dog for President Bush. The American Right (motto: Infighting for Freedom!) seemed moderately pleased that France had elected a ‘conservative’. Bill O’Reily even lifted his personal ban on France that had apparently cost them billions of imaginary Franco-dollars as reported in many imaginary Franco-publications.

Let’s be clear though; this is France – a nation with 5 political parties that self-identify as socialist, revolutionary or communist. The “ultra-conservative” Sarkozy, in a frightening shift to the radical right, is considering that he might want to look at possibly exploring the possibility of eventually drafting some legislation to extend the workweek beyond 35 hours. Wow.

Let’s not even mention that Sarkozy is an ally of Jacques Chirac and just-resigned Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin (translation: Dominic Likes Vile Bread) who did a very nice job of jointly telling the US to go pound Chauvignol prior to the invasion of Iraq. The last person to lead France that would appeal to the current American Administration was Napoleon Bonaparte.

2. Mitt “Mittens” Romney Declares War on France: In an accidental exercise of his First Amendment rights, Mitt Romney’s campaign expectorated a strategic document that listed France, Hillary Clinton and ‘Jihadism’ as “enemies…he could run against”. This would be a lot more troublesome if Mittens hadn’t already held every possible political stance in existence. Mittens Romney was for abortion, and is now against it. Mittens Romney was for gay marriage, and is now against it. Mittens Romney was against being a political tramp who would stoop so low as to eat a kettle of boiled moose droppings in exchange for your vote, and is now…you get the idea.

To illustrate how ludicrous this is, prior to seeing France as a campaign target, he was actually their Foreign Minister under the alias of Roland Dumas. Also, he used to be for Jihadism (you can’t become offended at this, since Jihadism is not even a word) and his Jihadism-ite codename? Hillary.

This Mittens guy has no shame…yet… this week.

3. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Sauer Captures Paris: You may not think that this is really about France, but Paris Hilton and the albino dude from the DaVinci Code look an awful lot alike. So since I’ve just spelled it out for you, I’ll move on.

Unlike many bloggers, I have no problem writing about Paris Hilton, but it’s only now that she’s done something really interesting. Paris has gone from merely being a vacuous rich girl to being an official, honest to jeebus convict. Paris might be going to jail for 45 days, or maybe for 21 days. Paris might be going to jail in California or they might incarcerate her in Arizona. All of this stems from the fact that the Los Angeles county jail is supremely overcrowded. Personally, I think we should send her to Gitmo, but that’s just me.

This is a girl who would have no trouble being interrogated by Marines or held in uncomfortable positions, injected with truth serum (or injected generally, I’m guessing) or forced to sit naked in a room full of strangers. If one of those strangers had a camera, the Marines might need reinforcements. Really, it’s a win-win.

Especially for France.

Wait…what?

Listed on humor-blogs.com

24 Responses to “I See Paris, I See France.”

  1. Grondzilla Says:

    As I try to massage my cheeks back into a less painful grin I’m reminded that you shouldn’t be allowed to *not* post for more than, let’s just say, three days in a row. Every missive from the Sinister tower ends up embiggening my enjoyment of life in general and my general amusement at the state of the world. It’s obvious we’re both paying attention to the same events, it’s just that you’re articulating it almost to perfection. Huzzah!

  2. Chainik Hocker Says:

    And a swing… and a miss. You lost it with the “kinky Paris Hilton/USMC sexual metaphors” stuff.

  3. Theresa Says:

    Were you about to finish your title with “I see Paris Hilton’s underpants”? Tears of laughter are still rolling down my cheeks over “in a brazen act of polygamy, was married to each of his footstools”. I must say that reading your post was so much better than reading the daily newspaper, I’ll surely be back for more.

  4. SinisterDan Says:

    Grondzilla and Theresa, thank you both. Compliments like that keep me writing.

    Chainik - given that everything I say here is tongue in cheek, I think its safe to assume that I am in no way impugning the United States Marine Corps (as fine a military institution as any) but rather just pointing out that (imo) Paris Hilton is a tremendous, machine-like slut.

  5. Chainik Hocker Says:

    I wasn’t expressing my indignation at an imagined slight to the Marine Corps, but rather my disappointment that you would deign to mention that wealthy animate skeleton at all. I thought you were classier than that, but apparently you would rather revel in muck.

    Seriously, I do my best to avoid any mention of Paris Hilton.

    Why is she famous again? Wiki was no help, there.

  6. SinisterDan Says:

    Revel in the muck? That seems very heavy handed.

    To be perfectly honest, the reason she’s in this post is that her name is Paris, and that’s also a city in France. If I’d have had two good stories about Germany, and needed a third, I don’t think she’d have made the cut. I’d have needed to find a girl named Dortmund.

    Do I think that Paris Hilton has earned her fame? Well, I don’t really care. I can think of dozens and dozens of public figures who seem to have no legitimate claim to their prominence, but there they are all the same. Do I think that PH is a good person? Certainly not, but that doesn’t exclude her from being a target for a joke or two.

    As I mentioned, I have never seen a reason to mention PH before, and I imagine it would require a strange twist of fate for her to be scribbled on by me again. But I do chafe at the notion that I’ve become less classy or baser because I decided to be mean to her, or to mention her at all.

    She’s repugnant but she is most certainly not taboo.

    As grist for the giggle-mill, she is an entirely appropriate raw material and guilty of lesser evils than many others. Regardless, fell free to be off-put at your own discretion, and not at mine.

  7. Chainik Hocker Says:

    Touche.

    You win this round… but I’ll be back!

    {shakes fist and rides away}

  8. SinisterDan Says:

    That’s why I like you so much.

  9. Grondzilla Says:

    I’m just shocked to think that we’ve sunk to discussing the likes of Paris Hilton when there is still ample space available on the internet to marvel at (the effects of) Katherine Harris’ Breasts. Where oh where will it all end?

  10. SinisterDan Says:

    You just preempted my next post.

    Bastard!

  11. Chainik Hocker Says:

    Katherine Harris’ breasts may excite you but, I gotta say, she’s older than either of my parents. She does nothing for me.

  12. SinisterDan Says:

    My reaction to the former congresswoman is more parts bizarre fascination and zero parts attraction.

    It’s like looking at an android…an android that’s started to melt.

  13. Grondzilla Says:

    Was there any suggestion that the Harris twins had any function beyond their ability to generate loathing, laughter and some kind of twisted right wing lust? The *point* here is that it seemed rather random to suggest that bringing up Paris Hilton was/is the camel herniating bit of straw in terms of Dan’s capacity to plumb the theoretical depths (which lets all face it is required after all those instances of hitting the heights…”and oh what heights we’ll hit!”). All I can say is ‘On with the show…this is it!’.

    We await the next rumination on philo-poli-popculture.

  14. Mark Base Says:

    Once again, you have surpassed…someone.

    I doubt very much that you’re the type to go for that “tag” nonsense so, with this very much in mind, I went ahead and tagged you.

    It’s about restaurants. And eating in them, I guess. Just pop over to Helsingblog and see for yourself.

    It had just occured to me that you’re the only bloke I’d tagged, so do me a favour will you?

  15. Diesel Says:

    I think the Bush administration would favor Louis XVI over Napoleon.

  16. SinisterDan Says:

    Actually, I was thinking more of Louis XIV when he said “l’etat, c’est moi”, as an indicator of total disregard for the balance of good governance, but he we has too competent to be compared to the sitting President.

    Also, such an explanation is about as funny as German poetry.

  17. Grondzilla Says:

    German or Vogon poetry…it’s a toss up I think.

  18. MC Says:

    In a non-French sense, I think Charles I of England is the best representative of his governing style.

  19. Malnurtured Snay Says:

    I’m sorry … France? Where is this country? Isn’t it now known as “Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys”?

  20. SinisterDan Says:

    Yeah, well…that too. I just couldn’t bring myself to quote The Simpsons.

  21. kweenkong Says:

    You’re writing’s a fabulous hoot! Love that you wove in Paris Hilton so cleverly. I shall definitely return, and thanks for stopping by the South Side Star. ;-)

    http://southsidestar.blogspot.com

    http://blogbandaids.blogspot.com

  22. paul Says:

    Please note that if you haven’t posted by June 15 - a scant four days from now - I’ll have to publicly excrete all over you once again. And lord knows what we’d get out of that.

  23. SinisterDan Says:

    This is too freaky - I was posting as I got this…

  24. paul Says:

    (calls back the flying monkeys)

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>